In our data, all five of Pawłowski and Dunbar’s categories appear as statistically significant key semantic domains, and we find other statistically significant categories.
Being happy, energetic and enjoying life appear at the top of our list.
Men’s preferences (in order) were: commitment, attractiveness, social skills, resources and sexiness.
In contrast, women’s preferences in order were: commitment, social skills, resources, attractiveness and sexiness.
The vocabulary and semantics of the online dating ads have not yet been investigated, although a number of studies in psychology and evolutionary anthropology have identified important personal trait categories, such as age, physical attractiveness, resources (current or future earning potential), and commitment to the relationship (Bereczkei & Csanaky 1996; Bereczkei et al.
Conclusion Sources and resources References web-based corpus processing software tool for linguistic analysis, in order to compare the language of men looking for women, men looking for men, women looking for women, and women looking for men. Linguistic research into the language of online dating ads is still scarce.
The vocabulary and semantics of online dating ads have not yet been investigated.This will also permit a comparison with the results obtained via interview-based methods of data collection in previous research such as Pawłowski and Dunbar (2001).We have collected texts from the online dating classified ads on the uk dating website web-based corpus processing software tool for linguistic analysis in order to compare the language of men looking for women, men looking for men, women looking for women, and women looking for men.Table 1 exemplifies the traits associated with these categories, based on the investigations conducted by Dunbar and his colleagues.The types of words coded for the categories of attractiveness, resources and commitment (to be precise, physical attractiveness, wealth/status and family commitment) were given in Waynforth and Dunbar (1995).